Brontoforumus

i wonder if these people repeatedly ram themselves into walls several hours of each day

Friday wrote:i wonder if these people repeatedly ram themselves into walls several hours of each day

That's probably what it takes to find a Cardassian attractive.

jesus christ mongrel

TA wrote:jesus christ mongrel

Okay, I'll bite.

What's the problem?

EDIT: I am assuming this is something to do with the Cardassian comment, since otherwise you'd be replying to both Friday and I?

The weird forehead ridges and prominent clavicles don't do them any favors, Bajoran nose ridges all the way

Mongrel wrote:

TA wrote:jesus christ mongrel

Okay, I'll bite.

What's the problem?

EDIT: I am assuming this is something to do with the Cardassian comment, since otherwise you'd be replying to both Friday and I?

nah, by all means, when you don't like someone's wife, definitely make it about how you personally don't find her attractive and think you'd have to have head trauma to think she was. that's totally legit and cool.

TA wrote:

Mongrel wrote:

TA wrote:jesus christ mongrel

Okay, I'll bite.

What's the problem?

EDIT: I am assuming this is something to do with the Cardassian comment, since otherwise you'd be replying to both Friday and I?

nah, by all means, when you don't like someone's wife, definitely make it about how you personally don't find her attractive and think you'd have to have head trauma to think she was. that's totally legit and cool.

I reserve the right to mock modern-day celebrities-for-the-sake-of-celebrity, yes. The way I think about what she looks like has little to do with my opinion of that family.

In any case, Kanye probably has actual brain damage. Or at least a severe mental illness. I'd say it was tragic, but I'm pretty sure he's been told to "get off the mic" by friends or family who're worried about him already and is choosing to ignore those recommendations.

then pick an avenue to mock women that isn't their appearance. this isn't hard.

TA wrote:then pick an avenue to mock women that isn't their appearance. this isn't hard.

You're the one making the assumption that when I typed "attraction" that automatically meant appearance. As opposed to, say, repellent vapidity.

you said "to find [her] attractive", come the fuck on with this. take the L.

TA wrote:you said "find [her] attractive", come the fuck on with this. take the L.

Yes?

Are you Spram?

Attraction encompasses many things? It's not a feature-segregated term, FFS.

jesus christ mongrel

real sapiosexual hours tonight

i tip my fedora to this level of semantic bullshit

Piss off. This isn't some fucking bullshit I just made up on the spot just to argue with you.

When I say attraction I am literally referring to all characteristics. This is what attractive literally MEANS. This is not some crazy new definition I just fucking made up.

If I want to say hot, I'll fucking say hot.

If I want to say ugly, I'll fucking say ugly.

I wouldn't refer to, say, a smoking hot homicidal lunatic as "attractive".

oh good, i was hoping we'd get a dictionary.com link to explain why there was actually nothing misogynistic at all about your comment.

TA wrote:I totally knew you were gonna do that

Guess you should have placed a bet.

Fuck's sakes, you even inserted the [her] YOURSELF, just to argue this nonsense.

I really did mean that whole stinking clan, you slavering dorkweasel.