Science!
Re: Science!
It's like how a tomato is actually a fruit: That might be true, but it doesn't mean I'm gonna start using them for smoothies.
Re: Science!
I mean.... ketchup?
- Mongrel
- Posts: 21290
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:28 pm
- Location: There's winners and there's losers // And I'm south of that line
Re: Science!
And then we discovered that Jox has been drinking ketchup smoothies for years.
(more soberingly, that reminds me of my grandma's tales of eating ketchup soup during the Depression).
(more soberingly, that reminds me of my grandma's tales of eating ketchup soup during the Depression).
Re: Science!
I hope she never had to cut it with sawdust or anything...
Re: Science!
Now that is something I can get excited about. Whenever I'm punking around in the desert I'm always thinking things like "this soil and terrain would be perfect for a vinyard if there were any fucking WATER." And then I spend an afternoon trying to daydream up a way of mass producing and scaling up the carapace of the namib desert beetle or something. Granted, there's more life in the desert than I think people really appreciate, but so much of what we think of as wasteland could be made a paradise if something like this gadget actually works and can be cheaply manufactured. Hell, maybe I can revive that dream of starting some kind of nerd commune out in the wastes. Let's be a pack of overeducated hipster Fremen. Drinks are on me.
Re: Science!
This is nonsense. To get water out of the air, there has to be water in the air. If there's enough water in the air to get a meaningful amount out, there's probably some on the ground, and getting it out of the air is pointless. Anywhere you could do it you probably don't need to and anywhere you can't it probably would be great if you could, but you can't. It doesn't matter how good you are at getting water out of their air if it straight up isn't there. Particularly this idea of just passively sitting there and doing it. How do you cycle enough air to get anything?
I am also extremely suspicious of their numbers, that much water that fast with no energy source?
And if you think "But MIT", some of those assholes thought the hyperloop could work, so I'm still leery.
I am also extremely suspicious of their numbers, that much water that fast with no energy source?
And if you think "But MIT", some of those assholes thought the hyperloop could work, so I'm still leery.
Re: Science!
The article says the energy source is the sun, or any other source of heat.
Either my poking around for math and whatnot about relative humidity is giving me some questionable results, though. The Mojave right now appears to be 60 degrees with 30% relative humidity. I think that means you'll need to process about 260.416 cubic meters of air to get one liter of water? Relative humidity is how much water is in the air compared to the maximum amount the air can hold at that temperature before it precipitates, This page puts that at 12.8 grams per cubic meter at 15 centigrade, 30% of which is 3.84 grams per cubic meter, which means 260.416 to break a liter.
The article appears to claim a liter every 3 or 4 hours in MIT weather, which is similar - 58 F and 26% right now. Assuming it works as advertised, that's just got to be a lot of air to be running through it. How much wind are they assuming, and how big is this box?
Neat if true though.
Either my poking around for math and whatnot about relative humidity is giving me some questionable results, though. The Mojave right now appears to be 60 degrees with 30% relative humidity. I think that means you'll need to process about 260.416 cubic meters of air to get one liter of water? Relative humidity is how much water is in the air compared to the maximum amount the air can hold at that temperature before it precipitates, This page puts that at 12.8 grams per cubic meter at 15 centigrade, 30% of which is 3.84 grams per cubic meter, which means 260.416 to break a liter.
The article appears to claim a liter every 3 or 4 hours in MIT weather, which is similar - 58 F and 26% right now. Assuming it works as advertised, that's just got to be a lot of air to be running through it. How much wind are they assuming, and how big is this box?
Neat if true though.
Re: Science!
Per the Brontoforumus Facebook Group:
Scientists from the ROM discover new dinosaur species, name it "Zuul"
Scientists from the ROM discover new dinosaur species, name it "Zuul"
Re: Science!
It's a few weeks old already, but Juno has captured pictures of Jupiter's south pole, and it's apparently cobalt blue.
: Mention something from KPCC or Rachel Maddow
: Go on about Homeworld for X posts
: Go on about Homeworld for X posts
Re: Science!
Yes, that was news four months ago.
Re: Science!
Still, not a bad trick. I wonder what it'd take to make a self-driving car follow a path that spells "PWNED" or some other sufficiently hackerific taunt.
Also, I haven't found any pictures yet, but I heard the Juno probe just sent back the closest photos ever taken of Jupiter's great red spot. Actually, I also heard that the spot's gotten more orange over the past few decades.
Also, I haven't found any pictures yet, but I heard the Juno probe just sent back the closest photos ever taken of Jupiter's great red spot. Actually, I also heard that the spot's gotten more orange over the past few decades.
: Mention something from KPCC or Rachel Maddow
: Go on about Homeworld for X posts
: Go on about Homeworld for X posts
Re: Science!
Self-driving cars are gonna be a bucket of laughter on snowy roads.
- Mongrel
- Posts: 21290
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:28 pm
- Location: There's winners and there's losers // And I'm south of that line
Re: Science!
Mother Jones: So, at this point, the theory that lead levels from leaded gas were responsible for the crime boom of the 60's-80's has enough data that it's not really a theory anymore; it's pretty much confirmed.
What's most interesting is the persistence problems they get into towards the end.
What's most interesting is the persistence problems they get into towards the end.
- Mongrel
- Posts: 21290
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:28 pm
- Location: There's winners and there's losers // And I'm south of that line
Re: Science!
I wonder if we should have a dedicated AI IS SCARY thread. Anyway...
Digital Journal: Facebook shut down an AI network that was programmed to communicate in English after it invented a new language and stopped talking in English.
Digital Journal: Facebook shut down an AI network that was programmed to communicate in English after it invented a new language and stopped talking in English.
Re: Science!
It's some sort of relief to be living in an era where the technology is still not so advanced that shutting down an AI like that would raise ethical concerns from anyone.
Re: Science!
Is this for real? Dinosaur fossil so well preserved, it looks like a statue. Like, if I didn't know better, I'd think it was a Pacific Rim concept.
: Mention something from KPCC or Rachel Maddow
: Go on about Homeworld for X posts
: Go on about Homeworld for X posts
- Mongrel
- Posts: 21290
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:28 pm
- Location: There's winners and there's losers // And I'm south of that line
Re: Science!
Yeah, that is real. And way way cool.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests