"Fort Hood Shooting" now has a disambiguation page on Wikipedia.
Because we need it now.
For fuck's sake.
Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
Okay, so, THIS is when you can use the argument that if anyone else had been armed, it probably would would've ended differently.
- Cthulhu-chan
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:25 am
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
Pretty much the only people who will have firearms on a military base are the MPs. Only base I've been to that had armed grunts as a regular thing was the base just south of the DMZ in South Korea.
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
But if you're conservative and you can't count the MP as "good guys with guns" I don't know who'd qualify?
Batman?
Batman?
- Cthulhu-chan
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:25 am
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
I'm just saying that random asshole at your average military base is just as likely to be armed as they are in most cities. Less so, in fact, because all firearms not issued for duty must be locked up in the company's arms room.
Ain't nobody lovingly oiling a shotty on their barracks balcony.
Ain't nobody lovingly oiling a shotty on their barracks balcony.
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
The gun purchased for the Fort Hood shooting was bought legally at a store called "Guns Galore".
Which shooting, you ask? Both.
Which shooting, you ask? Both.
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
TA wrote:The gun purchased for the Fort Hood shooting was bought legally at a store called "Guns Galore".
Which shooting, you ask? <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/03/guns-galore-fort-hood_n_5085997.html">Both.</a>
Both firearms used were purchased at the nearest gun store? :youdon'tsay:
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
Classic wrote:But if you're conservative and you can't count the MP as "good guys with guns" I don't know who'd qualify?
Batman?
Batman hates guns.
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
Except when he doesn't.
Re: Shooting at an Army Base...Again.
Both of those interpretations and the idea that emotion-based political opinions actually require coherent moral structure are the joke.
Which, in retrospect, I regret, because I don't know if the observation is primarily more tedious or tasteless in light of these recurring violent events.
Which, in retrospect, I regret, because I don't know if the observation is primarily more tedious or tasteless in light of these recurring violent events.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests