Page 1 of 6

Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 1:27 pm
by Mongrel


More alarmist headlines are calling this a "Potential American Chernobyl". I am hoping that will turn out to be grossly exaggerated, but then, Rick Perry is the relevant agency head here.

EDIT: For now it seems like water table contamination is the most serious potential problem.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:33 pm
by Mongrel
So the aftermath of all these hurricanes in Puerto Rico is looking pretty bad.

- They have no power and probably won't for months
- A huge amount of housing has been destroyed (some estimates are as high as 40% of all the housing on the island)
- Pretty much the entire harvest has been destroyed
- They're still having record temperatures
- The governor's estimate is that the island has been set back at least a generation
- Also they pretty much declared bankruptcy earlier this year

Some relief supplies are already on the way, but it's unclear how much exactly.

There's also conflicting reports about the Federal response. Some news articles are saying that the White House is slow-rolling things, and will only push for action in Congress in the first or second week of October. Others are saying that action will be initiated by congress and a response is being planned already.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:39 pm
by Sharkey
But football.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:44 pm
by Mongrel
I wonder if Trump realizes that Puerto Ricans have citizenship and can simply and legally move to a mainland state if it turns out that Puerto Rico will be uninhabitable for a few years.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 12:10 am
by Büge
Not that it compares to the human impact, but the Arecibo Observatory is also in ruins.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 1:08 am
by Thad
Mongrel wrote:I wonder if Trump realizes that Puerto Ricans have citizenship and can simply and legally move to a mainland state if it turns out that Puerto Rico will be uninhabitable for a few years.

And that the state will most likely be Florida.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 1:36 am
by Mongrel
While I'd like to continue being glib about Trump & politics, the more I read, the more this has the possibility to be worse than Katrina.

So, as I mentioned, Puerto Rico basically declared bankruptcy earlier this year. Part of the problem is that increasing numbers of Puerto Ricans are ALREADY emigrating to the continental states. At the beginning of the 200's the Population peaked at a little over 4 million. At the beginning of 2007, it was under 3.5 million (for reference, that's just under the median for all US states). That's crazy depopulation - well over 10% and maybe more than 15% gone in just over a decade.

It's a downward spiral - the more people leave, the fewer are left to pay the outstanding debts and taxes. Taxes for which Puerto Ricans currently receive no federal representation, I might add.

Anyway, the problem was that the Federal oversight body had already forced Puerto Rico into austerity mode as a response to the bankruptcy. Only now they'll need massive amounts of money they don't have, both for immediate relief efforts and long-term needs to rebuild.

On top of all this, there's a big problem looming over everything - a little thing called the Jones Act, an archaic WWI-era law still legally in force, which states that all (ocean?) shipping within US territory must use US-made and US-flagged boats, crewed only by American citizens. As a result, the cost to ship a standard container to Kingston, Jamaica from the US is about $1000, but to Puerto Rico it's well over $3000 (!). While you've probably never heard of it (I only learned about it today), it's quite well known in Puerto Rico and they've obviously been pleading for it to be repealed for ages.

In previous disasters in American Caribbean territory, the Jones Act has at least been suspended, but this has not yet happened for Puerto Rico, so it's already hideously draining relief efforts. It's not at all clear that even half-way adequate relief efforts are underway.

Puerto Rico could well wind up as badly off as Haiti suffered after their recent disasters. On top of everything else, if things really are that bad, the survivors will be fleeing for the mainland as fast as they can, only worsening the tax/debt problem.

Donate some money if you can because, man do they ever need it, and also call your congresscritter to get them to suspend (or better yet repeal) the Jones Act.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:41 am
by Brantly B.
Yeah because repealing a protectionist law to keep some brown people from starving to death is a super-easy sell these days.

If you're going to pitch it you need to pitch it at an angle. Go tell your nearest Dem that this is a golden opportunity to prove their non-uselessness; if they can get the Deplorable bloc to budge on this, then there's hope for them yet. Also, vice versa.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 12:02 pm
by Mongrel
Well, luckily "American shipbuilding" isn't exactly a big constituency these days AND what's left is mostly in blue states. It's a lot more palatable to the average Republican than just about any other situation involving repealing a protectionist law to save some brown folks could be.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:07 pm
by Mongrel
Trump isn't suspending the Jones Act for Puerto Rico.

Fucking rot in hell, asshole.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:07 pm
by Thad
I think there are a couple major factors to why this hasn't gained the kind of traction that New Orleans did. "Minority population" and "incompetent, oblivious president" are common factors, but here's what's different:

1. Power's out. We're not seeing video of what's happening down there and we're not getting firsthand reports from the people who live there.

2. It's a remote locale with a sense of exoticism to it. Some people don't know it's part of the US at all, and even those who do don't usually think of it when they think of places in the US. It's easier for Americans to think of this as a disaster in a foreign land and compartmentalize it the same way they do, say, the earthquakes in Mexico.

We've gotten used to living in a world where everybody carries a video camera in their pocket and can instantly share information with everybody in the world. That's not operative here. We need the traditional press down there, with generators and satellite linkups and whatever they can manage, covering this shit wall-to-wall like they did NOLA; I realize that it's not easy to get down there and that aid and evacuation are priorities, but better press coverage is probably the best way to put pressure on politicians to step up aid and evacuation.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:18 pm
by Mongrel
Oh I agree absolutely. But in theory the President should have more information and awareness than a random citizen, and so has no such excuse. Only it's Trump, so.....

Yahoo: more information, including McCain hammering away at the administration over the issue

Good on him.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:35 am
by Brantly B.
Mongrel wrote:Trump isn't suspending the Jones Act for Puerto Rico.


He finally caved.

That Churchill quote about Americans doing the right thing only after they've tried everything else really does have the current administration pegged. It's actually kind of hopeful, in an incredibly frustrating way.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:50 pm
by Mongrel
In more Puerto Rico news, evacuees are having their passports restricted until they pay the government for their evacuation (is that even constitutional? Who cares, amirite?).

They're also not accepting payment right now.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:52 pm
by Mongrel
Good news update: Turns out the above story (reported this morning by both The Hill and Marketwatch and then picked up from there) was was wrong. It was based on a State Department page which is undated and presented as current, but which was actually just lazily recycled boilerplate from the Lebanon evac in 2014.

The payments are only required when the State Department evacuates people from non-US territory (and is waived in some cases, mostly related to medical emergencies). The policy doesn't apply to Puerto Rico at all and existing domestic disaster relief legislation specifically includes Puerto Rico with the mainland states.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:55 pm
by Mongrel


Meanwhile, back on the mainland...



No, really, fuck this guy in his eyesocket with a fucking flagpole


Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:07 am
by Thad
NPR (which has really done a good job of staying on top of the Puerto Rico story where other media have spent more time on the President being mad at the NFL) noted that he hasn't mentioned Texas or Florida owing money for their rebuilding.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 2:43 am
by Mongrel

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 11:13 am
by Smiler




Says the man on vacation at his fucking golf course dooming US citizens to die.

Re: Disasters, natural or otherwise

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 12:29 pm
by zaratustra
getting kinda worried. I think there's an ex-VERGEr in Puerto Rico.