WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Moderators: Friday, LaserBeing

User avatar
Newbie
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:30 pm
Location: January 20th, 2014, 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Newbie » Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:05 pm

First vote from Caithness is just to prod the inactive and doesn't really say much, I think. Immediate second vote from hngkong is maybe suspicious, but not as much as Kayma piling on vote number 3 right afterward.
tiny text

User avatar
Newbie
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:30 pm
Location: January 20th, 2014, 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Newbie » Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:07 pm

(This is all in reference to the current dogpile on Romo, okay. Day 1 is a crapshoot, of course, but this is all happening awfully fast.)
tiny text

User avatar
hngkong
Posts: 604
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:29 am

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby hngkong » Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:15 pm

I stand by my vote. Romosome. What could be worse than a werewolf? A dogwolf. Weredogwolf. Dog werewolf. Something like that.

User avatar
Caithness
Posts: 940
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:45 pm
Location: Mint is a vegetable, right?

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Caithness » Wed Aug 15, 2018 7:54 pm

Newbie wrote:First vote from Caithness is just to prod the inactive and doesn't really say much, I think. Immediate second vote from hngkong is maybe suspicious, but not as much as Kayma piling on vote number 3 right afterward.


I dunno, Kayma's could easily be viewed as a self-preservation vote since there was already one on him. Friday, on the other hand, chose to bring Romo one vote from death rather than exploring other options.

User avatar
Kayma
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 1:40 am

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Kayma » Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:16 pm

I'll second that Friday vote in the interest of setting things on fire and seeing what happens.

User avatar
Romosome
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 7:14 pm

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Romosome » Wed Aug 15, 2018 9:12 pm

I'm keeping my vote on Kayma for now.

User avatar
Grath
Posts: 2388
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Grath » Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:08 am

Kayma, because I can't stand the idea of hurting a dog.

User avatar
Caithness
Posts: 940
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:45 pm
Location: Mint is a vegetable, right?

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Caithness » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:05 pm

Isn't hurting dogs the whole point of this game?

Anyway, we haven't heard a thing from leeham other than checking in yet.

User avatar
Newbie
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:30 pm
Location: January 20th, 2014, 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Newbie » Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:58 am

I've always been a fan of voting as a way of forcing interaction, so sure, I'll switch to Leeham.
tiny text

User avatar
LaserBeing
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 3:24 am
Contact:

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby LaserBeing » Sat Aug 18, 2018 4:04 am

well then Romosome I guess ┐('~`;)┌

User avatar
Newbie
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:30 pm
Location: January 20th, 2014, 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Newbie » Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:12 pm

Alright, things have slowed down, so let's see where they stand. With 9 players, it takes 5 votes to lynch.

Romosome has 4 votes: beatbandito, Friday, hngkong, and LaserBeing.
LaserBeing has 2 votes: Newbie and Caithness.
Kayma has 2 votes: Grath and Romosome.
Friday has 1 vote from Kayma.

This would seem like a logical time to switch to Romosome and get Day 1 over with, but why do that when I can instead examine some arbitrary metric to try to squeeze more information out of Day 0/Day 1 behaviors? To that end, here's a survey of word counts from participants in this game prior to this post, in order of initial post:

Newbie - 110
Caithness - 106
beatbandito - 63
Friday - 66
hngkong - 47
Grath - 14
LaserBeing - 9
Kayma - 31
Romosome - 139

In order to maximize our information, I should switch my vote to LaserBeing, except I'm ALREADY voting for LaserBeing, and oh fuck it Romosome. I don't think voting for the person who's said the most so far sets a good precedent, though it won't stop me from leaving this post as wordy as it is.
tiny text

User avatar
Lottel
Posts: 501
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:07 pm

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Lottel » Mon Aug 20, 2018 9:30 am

All the votes are tallied.
You cast your murderous hearts towards hanging up Romosome.

He was a Vanilla Innocent.
Whoops!


Night begins.
Image

User avatar
Lottel
Posts: 501
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:07 pm

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Lottel » Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:13 pm

Everyone wakes to find their favourite Kayma torn to shreds!

Whoopsie! Those darn wolves are still at it!

Let's fix that.
Image

User avatar
Caithness
Posts: 940
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:45 pm
Location: Mint is a vegetable, right?

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Caithness » Tue Aug 21, 2018 12:35 am

Hmm, interesting. If I were a wolf I don't think I would have chosen to kill the living player we came closest to lynching last time.

User avatar
Friday
Posts: 6272
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:40 pm
Location: Karma: -65373

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Friday » Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:22 am

Newbie - voted Romo last to kill
Caithness
beatbandito - voted Romo
Friday - voted Romo
hngkong - voted Romo
Grath
LaserBeing - voted Romo
Kayma - Dead, innocent
Romosome - Dead, innocent

Of the five who voted for Romo, beat and laser strike me as most suspicious.

I'm not voting yet, because I want more discussion, and don't have any evidence beyond bog standard voting pattern aiming.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Friday
Posts: 6272
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:40 pm
Location: Karma: -65373

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Friday » Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:24 am

Also, Lottel, could we get a list of the basics, like how many starting wolves, if there's even a Seer, or a Baner, or what?

So far all I know is this is a "simple" game, which could mean just wolves and innos, or wolf/inno/seer, or who knows.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Newbie
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:30 pm
Location: January 20th, 2014, 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)j

Postby Newbie » Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:39 am

I wanna hear what LaserBeing thinks we should do, 'cause those lips have (still) barely moved.
tiny text

User avatar
Lottel
Posts: 501
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:07 pm

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Lottel » Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:26 am

There are two wolves. They are the sole special roles.
Image

User avatar
Grath
Posts: 2388
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby Grath » Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:30 am

Not that I'm doing that much more talking but I have an excuse (I'm in Seattle on a business trip), let's go ahead and prompt LaserBeing to start talking a bit more.

Caithness wrote:Hmm, interesting. If I were a wolf I don't think I would have chosen to kill the living player we came closest to lynching last time.

I know that in previous wolfgames I've gone for aiming to kill/convert the person that was most voted for in an effort to frame people but with this just being wolves I don't know.

User avatar
beatbandito
Posts: 4300
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:04 am

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)

Postby beatbandito » Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:45 am

Newbie's "science!" post was suspicious to me because those types of posts always are, but I'm not invested enough to start a bandwagon that will make me the focus for tomorrow's lynch if he's innocent.

None of this is very helpful information yet, but not actively participating in society and seeming suspicious will likely lead to my death by lynch mob in real life so I'd like to avoid it here.
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests