mharr wrote:The value of Loki is directly proportional to how hard you wanna bang Tom Hiddleston, which I can't honestly claim as a zero.
yeccch
He's got that greasy mothballed Snape vibe going
(also he killed Baldur! Liek wtf man!)
mharr wrote:The value of Loki is directly proportional to how hard you wanna bang Tom Hiddleston, which I can't honestly claim as a zero.
atog wrote:mharr wrote:The value of Loki is directly proportional to how hard you wanna bang Tom Hiddleston, which I can't honestly claim as a zero.
yeccch
He's got that greasy mothballed Snape vibe going
(also he killed Baldur! Liek wtf man!)
Friday wrote:I understand the feeling, though, I just assume they feel the same attraction to Tom as I do to NPH or Nathan Fillion.
Thad wrote:The guy who really got the short end of the stick, though, was Dylan Baker. Shows up in two movies as Curt Connors, then the Lizard is the main villain in the next movie but bam it's a reboot and the role is recast. Maybe they can work him in, like Billy Dee Williams in Lego Batman.
KingRoyal wrote:DC has started referring to their collection of movies, animated features and other stuff as a "Multiverse" but I think that's just branding because of all the different media they have spinning, and not because of any official direction for their cinematic universe. Though, labeling it all as a "multiverse" and allowing that the Harley Quinn films now take place in a universe separate from the Snyder stuff is probably better in the long run.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests