Heidi MacDonald's got a pretty great breakdown of the
Cap controversy.
Part of it involves a link to Jessica Plummer's
On Steve Rogers #1, Antisemitism, and Publicity Stunts, and this response from Jim Simon:
Jim shows up in the comments and adds:
Yes, Heidi, I was and am offended by the story line. Hell, all I heard was Captain America was always a member of Hydra (Nazism) and is now as well. Do I have a right to find offense in that story line? Damn right I do. At the same time I am against death threats or any kind of violence against the writer or anyone associated with the story.
So, to correct what I said earlier: the evidence we've got at this point from people who knew them is that Kirby would not have given a fuck about this but Simon would have been offended.
It was just as shitty for me to put words in Simon's mouth as it is for anyone else to put words in Kirby's, and I apologize.
But I don't withdraw my criticism of fans who only seem to give a fuck about creators' rights when it comes to arguing about current storylines, and not when it comes to how publishers actually treated and continue to treat those creators and their families. One of these things concerns stories and the other concerns real life; vocal fandoms tend to lose perspective on which of those two things is more important.
Tim Hodler at
The Comics Journal raises another point, even if he doesn't do it in a very good way:
Not that the people complaining don’t have a certain point; it’s true that the new storyline (Captain America is revealed as a secret member of the evil terrorist organization Hydra) trivializes real-world problems such as white supremacists and fascist paramilitary groups. But that criticism holds for any story featuring Hydra, regardless of whether or not Captain America is a secret member. And once you go that far, pretty much every colorfully costumed supervillain trivializes terroristic violence and every superhero is a travesty on vigilante justice and/or the police state. The genre is inherently messed up, politically speaking.
Captain America has
always, on some level, trivialized Nazism. So does
any superhero story that features Hitler or Nazis.
Warren Ellis wrote this about Kirby back in '09:
He had killed the soldiers of a foe that we now forget was this vast and surreal thing. Even their flags were the size of office buildings, and bore only an alien-looking, jagged black symbol upon them. It’s worth watching Leni Riefenstahl’s TRIUMPH OF THE WILL, to grasp exactly how strange Nazi Germany was. My daughter’s great-Nana was German, and she’d speak sometimes of those days in Germany, when Hitler arriving in your German town was the cause of utter hysteria, people losing control to the extent of pissing themselves or (also recalled by sf writer Algis Budrys, who also worked on the comics magazine HELP!) having seizures and literally shitting themselves.
Just from the single sheer presence of a man built up by art as much as politics: a man whose very appearance caused body-wrenching awe and fear, this ultimate villain, this enemy of life who had no compunction about stamping out Jacob Kurtzberg’s life along with that of his entire race.
I could have sworn there was a line in there about how it's easy to forget how deeply scary Hitler was because guys like Ellis himself have spent generations mocking him, telling stories that serve to de-fang him and make him laughable. I can't find that line now but I'm pretty sure I read
something to that effect by Ellis a few years ago.
(For a bit of a note on the timeline: Kirby, of course, co-created Cap
before he served in the war, but came back to him in the 1960's and again in the 1970's. I think you can definitely see a difference in perspective -- Cap's clearly got PTSD when they thaw him out, and spends most of his time mourning Bucky -- but he is, after all, fighting a Nazi scientist who can't take his hood off because it is superglued to his face. A sober rumination on genocide it ain't.)
I think Cap's a great character, and certainly what he symbolizes is inherently a part of who he is. But he's also a four-color superhero, and subject to the same kinds of stories as other four-color superheroes. And those stories are about exaggeration, about simplistic, over-the-top depictions of good and evil. I don't see a story where Cap turning out to be a Hydra agent (or having false memories implanted or whatever this turns out to be) is inherently different from one where Iron Man turns out to be an AIM agent (and I don't see either one of those premises as being nearly as bad as the one where Iron Man turned out to be an alcoholic). YMMV, obviously. I'm not interested in this story, but I'm not offended by it, either; at least, not any more than I am by every other dumb "everything you know is wrong" last-page reveal.