Not quite sure what you mean?
Here's the statement in the local paper as of the current time:
The gunman who killed 19 children and two teachers crossed the grounds of the Texas elementary school without being confronted and entered the building through an unlocked door, authorities said on Thursday, offering another new account of the events that proceeded the massacre.
[killer] crashed his pickup truck outside the school at 11:28 a.m. (1628 GMT) on Tuesday, fired several shots at two bystanders across the street and walked into the school at 11:40 a.m. (1640 GMT), Victor Escalon, a spokesperson for the Texas Department of Public Safety, said at a news conference.
Escalon said two responding officers entered the school four minutes later but took cover after Ramos fired multiple rounds at them.
So I'm not exactly sure what you're getting at here? Even the county shill limply defending the cops is doing a crap job and his statement is being contradicted within the same article. I think even the most unflattering accounts by the most hostile sources are all still basically on some variation of the cops running and hiding like chickenshits, with maybe some differences regarding where/when. Like Brent said, this is effectively aiding and abetting anyway.
So are you saying that the cops actively had some kind of conversation with the killer and proceeded to tell him to go on his merry way? I mean.. I
think that's the only way they can look even worse after all that's come out?