Mongrel wrote:Clickbait garbage aside, the WaPo also published this absolutely fascinating longform article today:
Well, last week, but it's still a good article.
Mongrel wrote:Clickbait garbage aside, the WaPo also published this absolutely fascinating longform article today:
Firefox is also getting a stronger focus on user growth “through differentiated user experiences.”
Brentai wrote:Yeah, now count how many of those you actually have right now.
When asked why Mozilla had stripped back the number of extensions, a company spokesperson replied: “Extensions can add powerful customization features to Firefox. However, we have noticed that the number of add-ons available for Firefox today can be overwhelming for some users. And even though our policy provides clear guidelines for the behavior of add-ons, they sometimes find it difficult to decide which tools and developers they consider most trustworthy. That's why we established the ‘recommended extensions’ program: a collection of curated extensions that meet our highest standards for security, functionality and usability, which we are now bringing to another platform with the new Firefox for Android.”
Thad wrote:Firefox is also getting a stronger focus on user growth “through differentiated user experiences.”
You know, you might have thought of that before you spent the past decade trying to make Firefox look and feel exactly like Chrome.
Brentai wrote:Debatable on desktop, but on mobile I can't think of a single reason why you'd be opting to use Firefox other than you prefer its extension library.
Blossom wrote:Functional adblock
and privacy
not feeding everything you do to Google.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests