Impeachment
Re: Impeachment
There are reports that there are enough votes to call witnesses. So far, they're anonymously sourced; take it with a grain of salt until the vote actually happens. Always be wary of the "Collins and Romney will save us" narrative.
If anyone's called, it'll be Bolton. I figure Schiff's team will probably also try to call the rest of the witnesses who refused to testify in the House.
If they have to call witnesses, I expect the Republicans will call Hunter and/or Jeff Bidet. There's been talk since the trial started of a "witness trade" -- "We'll allow Bolton to testify if you allow Hunter Biden to testify." That's silly, for a variety of reasons, not least of which is that the Republicans have a majority and do not need any Democratic votes to call a witness.
Calling either Biden is a win for Trump's side because it muddies the waters, it reinforces the narrative that Hunter Biden really was doing something corrupt in Ukraine and Trump was right to call for an investigation. (Plus, I want Jeff Bidet to lose the primary, but I don't want it to be because of this, and I don't want it to look like it's even possible it was because of this.)
Regardless, even if Republicans do their best to turn it into a circus, if the impeachment team gets to call more witnesses then that's a big fucking deal. It still probably doesn't mean Trump gets convicted, but it brings it one step closer, and could make for some huge gains in the court of public opinion.
If anyone's called, it'll be Bolton. I figure Schiff's team will probably also try to call the rest of the witnesses who refused to testify in the House.
If they have to call witnesses, I expect the Republicans will call Hunter and/or Jeff Bidet. There's been talk since the trial started of a "witness trade" -- "We'll allow Bolton to testify if you allow Hunter Biden to testify." That's silly, for a variety of reasons, not least of which is that the Republicans have a majority and do not need any Democratic votes to call a witness.
Calling either Biden is a win for Trump's side because it muddies the waters, it reinforces the narrative that Hunter Biden really was doing something corrupt in Ukraine and Trump was right to call for an investigation. (Plus, I want Jeff Bidet to lose the primary, but I don't want it to be because of this, and I don't want it to look like it's even possible it was because of this.)
Regardless, even if Republicans do their best to turn it into a circus, if the impeachment team gets to call more witnesses then that's a big fucking deal. It still probably doesn't mean Trump gets convicted, but it brings it one step closer, and could make for some huge gains in the court of public opinion.
Re: Impeachment
Impeachment fan fiction: the Senate calls the Bidens. They don't show up; they're like "Oh, I heard it was OK to just ignore congressional subpoenas." Dare the Senate to have them arrested and then have to justify not doing the same for Mulvaney.
Real life: this wouldn't work, because Republicans have already abandoned all pretense of being motivated by anything but partisanship, and 43% of the public doesn't care.
Real life: this wouldn't work, because Republicans have already abandoned all pretense of being motivated by anything but partisanship, and 43% of the public doesn't care.
- Brantly B.
- Woah Dangsaurus
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 2:40 pm
Re: Impeachment
You definitely lose the claim that you're the Presidential candidate who isn't going to try and munchkin both the letter and the spirit of the law.
Re: Impeachment
I guess you're right. Showing total contempt for the rule of law while simultaneously claiming to be a champion of law and order only works if you're a Republican.
- Brantly B.
- Woah Dangsaurus
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 2:40 pm
Re: Impeachment
As it should be, or else your political parties are just Donald Trump and Donald Trump with Extra Avocado.
Re: Impeachment
Well, when the comparison is between a racist, sexist, homophobic, criminal dinosaur with a penchant for sexually assaulting children, or Donald Trump ...
Re: Impeachment
I held out hope.
I held out hope that Republicans would see an opportunity to excise a tumor from their ranks and stop killing this country.
But they won't. Because I'm a fucking mark.
And now, today, shitty, disgusting white people will vote to usher in a fascist dictatorship because they have no sense of patriotism or historical context. They only care about themselves.
And people will continue to suffer.
I hate Republicans.
I hate Trump.
I especially hate McConnell. They can all fuck off.
I held out hope that Republicans would see an opportunity to excise a tumor from their ranks and stop killing this country.
But they won't. Because I'm a fucking mark.
And now, today, shitty, disgusting white people will vote to usher in a fascist dictatorship because they have no sense of patriotism or historical context. They only care about themselves.
And people will continue to suffer.
I hate Republicans.
I hate Trump.
I especially hate McConnell. They can all fuck off.
Re: Impeachment
I'm pretty fucking disheartened too, but I do wish the media wouldn't call the results of a vote before it actually happens.
Re: Impeachment
Its social media calling it already, which is what's got me disheartened.
- Mongrel
- Posts: 21338
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:28 pm
- Location: There's winners and there's losers // And I'm south of that line
Re: Impeachment
Well, it's confirmed now. No witnesses.
Re: Impeachment
I didn't realize I still had the capacity to get this upset over something I considered a foregone conclusion.
("This" being the refusal to call witnesses. The acquittal still hasn't happened just yet, but it's another foregone conclusion that I expect will make me very unhappy when it does.)
But, well, I just gotta hope that all this makes a difference in November.
This and whatever else happens in the next nine months. Trump's stonewalling may have allowed him to survive impeachment, but it's also likely that it means a bunch of bad news about everything from Ukraine to his taxes coming out right before the election.
("This" being the refusal to call witnesses. The acquittal still hasn't happened just yet, but it's another foregone conclusion that I expect will make me very unhappy when it does.)
But, well, I just gotta hope that all this makes a difference in November.
This and whatever else happens in the next nine months. Trump's stonewalling may have allowed him to survive impeachment, but it's also likely that it means a bunch of bad news about everything from Ukraine to his taxes coming out right before the election.
Re: Impeachment
Hes gonna do everything he can to keep his taxes under wraps.
And the courts will let him, because in this hell timeline, good people are not permitted anything that could generate joy.
And the courts will let him, because in this hell timeline, good people are not permitted anything that could generate joy.
Re: Impeachment
I'm sorry I'm so negative of late.
I'm just so exhausted.
I'm just so exhausted.
Re: Impeachment
I don't think even this Supreme Court is going to let the "the president can't be investigated for anything, for any reason, while in office" argument ride.
Re: Impeachment
McDohl wrote:Hes gonna do everything he can to keep his taxes under wraps.
And the courts will let him, because in this hell timeline, good people are not permitted anything that could generate joy.
Of course I say this the day Rush Limbaugh announces he has lung cancer.
Fuck cancer, and fuck Limbaugh.
Re: Impeachment
It bears remembering that Limbaugh spent years spreading Big Tobacco propaganda about how tobacco doesn't cause cancer.
Re: Impeachment
Thad wrote:I don't think even this Supreme Court is going to let the "the president can't be investigated for anything, for any reason, while in office" argument ride.
I long for the days when I had your naïve optimism.
How fleeting are all human passions compared with the massive continuity of ducks.
- zaratustra
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:45 pm
Re: Impeachment
i mean they don't have to let it ride
the president is a master of legal waffling
the president is a master of legal waffling
Re: Impeachment
Upthorn wrote:Thad wrote:I don't think even this Supreme Court is going to let the "the president can't be investigated for anything, for any reason, while in office" argument ride.
I long for the days when I had your naïve optimism.
It's not optimism, it's just a different kind of cynicism.
Conservative Supreme Court justices are similar to conservative elected officials, but they're not quite the same thing. They aren't running for reelection; they're thinking past the next election and they're aware that, no matter how much they gut the Voting Rights Act and uphold gerrymandering, sooner or later there's probably going to be another Democratic president.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests