WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Moderators: Friday, LaserBeing
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Hey LaserBeing: Friday and Grath are gunning for you, and unless I missed a post somewhere, it looks like you're still voting for me, despite not even mentioning me in your response to Friday's "name and shame your wolf" exercise. Do you wanna update your vote, or is my suspicion correct that you just want any innocent player to die?
tiny text
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Newbie wrote:
Is your concern that Friday and hngkong are the wolves, and Friday doesn't want to be voting for the same person as her partner?
Yes.
- LaserBeing
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 3:24 am
- Contact:
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Newbie wrote:Hey LaserBeing: Friday and Grath are gunning for you, and unless I missed a post somewhere, it looks like you're still voting for me, despite not even mentioning me in your response to Friday's "name and shame your wolf" exercise. Do you wanna update your vote, or is my suspicion correct that you just want any innocent player to die?
oh yeah sorry I still think you are a wolf too! I guess I should have been more clear
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Not a problem, and thanks for confirming! I'd probably vote for you right now, except then you'd be one vote from death, and Grath still hasn't given us two names yet.
tiny text
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Here's a second name: Caithness. (Also some suspicion about Friday in the background...)
Reasons:
1) Caithness voted for not-Romo: Wolves probably avoided voting for the same person.
2) Caithness voted for not-Kayma: There's some suspicion on who voted for Kayma, now that Kayma is a dead and confirmed innocent.
Reasons:
1) Caithness voted for not-Romo: Wolves probably avoided voting for the same person.
2) Caithness voted for not-Kayma: There's some suspicion on who voted for Kayma, now that Kayma is a dead and confirmed innocent.
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
If wolves avoided voting for the same person and one of them voted for Romo, then a guaranteed wolf is either Caithness or you. I think you're telling the truth by omission, which is why I'm changing my vote to Grath.
tiny text
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Part 2 there was "also it would be stupid to kill Kayma directly after voting for Kayma."
(Oh, but then I'm playing 4D chess to set that up as an alibi.)
(Oh, but then I'm playing 4D chess to set that up as an alibi.)
- LaserBeing
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 3:24 am
- Contact:
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Grath wrote:(Oh, but then I'm playing 4D chess to set that up as an alibi.)
damn, you're always one step ahead! but what if I vote for Grath
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
LaserBeing wrote:but what if I vote for Grath
Then you're voting for an innocent and I'm definitely keeping my vote on you.
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
beatbandito is the only person who hasn't voted yet.
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
It's true; beatbandito hasn't voted yet. Voting stands as follows:
TWO VOTES
LaserBeing (voted by Grath and Friday)
Grath (voted by Newbie and LaserBeing)
ONE VOTE
beatbandito (voted by hngkong)
hngkong (voted by Caithness)
It takes four votes to kill today, so in addition to beatbandito casting a vote, at minimum one more person will need to change their existing vote to bring Day 2 to a close.
TWO VOTES
LaserBeing (voted by Grath and Friday)
Grath (voted by Newbie and LaserBeing)
ONE VOTE
beatbandito (voted by hngkong)
hngkong (voted by Caithness)
It takes four votes to kill today, so in addition to beatbandito casting a vote, at minimum one more person will need to change their existing vote to bring Day 2 to a close.
tiny text
- beatbandito
- Posts: 4235
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:04 am
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
It's true!
I am somewhat tempted to vote for Caithness just to complete the circle, but since I already managed to recover from the edge once today I'll instead solidify my vote for Laser. Though as stated my original major reasoning was flawed, his posting habits have remained pretty much the same and no one else has stood out enough to me enough to sway my attention.
I am somewhat tempted to vote for Caithness just to complete the circle, but since I already managed to recover from the edge once today I'll instead solidify my vote for Laser. Though as stated my original major reasoning was flawed, his posting habits have remained pretty much the same and no one else has stood out enough to me enough to sway my attention.

Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Oh that's cool my previous top two wolves are now the only players voting with me



- beatbandito
- Posts: 4235
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:04 am
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Have fun winning, Wolves, since my fellow innocents will need perfect accuracy from here on out.
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
So, hngkong and Caithness: you two are each voting for someone with only one vote. We may have a frontrunner, but if you two update your voting preferences, nothing is guaranteed yet. Care to chime in, or are we gonna let another 24 hours pass with no thread activity?
tiny text
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
I'm not sold on either of them being guilty, but I guess I'll change my vote to LaserBeing because I get more information by seeing which way hngkong votes than I do by killing Grath.
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
Apologies, first week at school. I've been preparing for classes I've never taught before and have been dealing with all sorts of weird issues...
I'm also not sold on either particularly too much, but I felt that Laser was more likely a wolf than Grath.
I'm also not sold on either particularly too much, but I felt that Laser was more likely a wolf than Grath.
Re: WEREWOLF 101 (PT)
That's four votes, isn't it? By my reckoning LaserBeing has votes from Grath, beatbandito, Caithness, and hngkong. (The other three players—myself, LaserBeing, and Friday—are voting for Grath.) Still with us, Lottel?
tiny text
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest